San José flood victims prepare for court battle

Hundreds of families are bracing for an upcoming court battle with the city of San José, Santa Clara County and Santa Clara Valley Water District, nearly two years after their homes were destroyed and lives upended by the flooding of Coyote Creek.

About 150 flood victims filed a lawsuit last year in Santa Clara County Superior Court, citing negligent infliction of emotional distress and breach of mandatory duty, among other claims. All three public agencies have vowed to fight back at a court hearing on January 11th, citing state laws they say let them off the hook.

Officials neglected to prepare themselves or residents for the storms, the lawsuit claims, calling it the government’s “failure to properly and reasonably design, control, maintain and operate” overspilling and flooding at Anderson Dam and Coyote Creek, and to alert residents ahead of time about the approaching flood. More than 14,000 Rock Springs and Olinder Park residents were displaced by the February 2017 disaster that caused $100 million in property damage and that the victims said was avoidable and easily foreseen.

Court documents also blame the city for not adequately managing emergency shelters or prioritizing affordable housing for citizens, which subjected “displaced plaintiffs and and their neighbors to additional trauma and distress.”

San José stepped up to help victims, city attorney Rick Doyle told San José Spotlight, but said the California Emergency Services Act “provides immunity from liability” for the city, which has filed legal papers to dismiss the case.

“The city took great efforts to deal with the flood victims as best they could,” Doyle said, adding they were “very aggressive” about working with nonprofits to help get victims back on their feet.”

Attorney Amanda Hawes, who represents the mostly working-class families in the suit, said in an interview that officials are guilty of brushing off their duty to the public.

“They’re basically saying, ‘We shouldn’t have to pay anything because we’re the government, and we’re immune because we’re the government, and there are immunities for the government in emergencies,’” she said. “Our response is everything you say doesn’t apply to the facts of the case.”

Government means you have to do something, she added, not ‘it’s an emergency so we don’t have to do anything.’”

Doyle said the city and water district have collaborated on public outreach since the flooding, including hosting winter preparedness workshops and meetings in affected neighborhoods, and improving communication systems.

Jim McManis, a San José attorney representing the Santa Clara Valley Water District, did not return calls for comment. Kimberly Forrester, who works at the Santa Clara County Counsel’s office, declined comment due to pending litigation.

Long-time Rock Springs resident Hien Nguyen, who is in her 70s, said it’s been too little, too late for herself and her neighbors.

Nguyen lost everything except the clothes on her back and another set that she managed to save while escaping more than four feet of water in her apartment. Most of the assistance that Nguyen said she received right after the disaster came from private groups like Sacred Heart Community Service and Catholic Charities, giving her food and shelter in hotels for five months until she and her disabled roommate could move back into their remodeled home.

“If they care about us, they should give us warning, but no warning,” Nguyen said. “That makes me think we don’t matter to the city, to the county or to the water district. If they care about us, they would have done more, they could have prevented the flooding, and even if the flooding was happening, they gave us no chance to save anything.”

Contact Julia Baum at [email protected] or follow her @jbaum_news on Twitter.

 

Comment Policy (updated 5/10/2023): Readers are required to log in through a social media or email platform to confirm authenticity. We reserve the right to delete comments or ban users who engage in personal attacks, hate speech, excess profanity or make verifiably false statements. Comments are moderated and approved by admin.

Leave a Reply