San Jose behind on housing goals, Liccardo suggests cutting taxes

As part of the city’s first-of-its-kind housing crisis workplan, Mayor Sam Liccardo is proposing temporarily slashing construction taxes on high-rises in half and redirecting the other half to an affordable housing fund.

To reduce financial burdens on housing developers amid rising construction costs, Liccardo also proposes allowing developers to pay fees and taxes at the time of certificate of occupancy. That change could potentially reduce financing costs on a development by up to $1.5 million.

“The rising costs of development — land, labor, and materials — have stalled several housing projects from construction in San Jose, as home builders cannot obtain financing because their pro-formas cannot meet the hurdle rates demanded by investors and lenders,” Liccardo wrote in his memo.

The mayor worried that building housing towers in downtown will become even more “far-fetched” once an exemption to the city’s “inclusionary housing” ordinance – which requires setting aside a certain number of affordable units – expires in June 2021. After that, the high-rise housing developers in downtown will be subject to the ordinance.

As part of the discussion Tuesday, Councilmember Raul Peralez suggested dispersing affordable housing throughout the city – not just in one district. The downtown district is home to the most low-income housing, Peralez said, and residents are starting “to feel the oversaturation within their neighborhoods.”

“Continued shortage of affordable housing in certain areas will further segregate our communities, deepen our growing economic inequality, and threaten the cultural livelihood that makes San Jose the great city that it is,” Peralez said.

In 2017, Liccardo implored city officials to respond to the state’s housing crisis. Last year, the City Council adopted the first workplan that aims to spark housing development.

Councilors on Tuesday will review the 34-point workplan. Of the initiatives underway since the council adopted the plan last year, eight have been completed.

Many of the workplan’s initiatives are also near completion, including:

  • Making additional residential units available in North San Jose (spring 2019).
  • Developing anti-displacement and diversion strategies (fall 2019).
  • Leveraging private money for affordable housing (in progress).
  • Exploring the creation of a land trust (research to be completed mid-2019).

The workplan also has 12 initiatives that the city plans to undertake later this year or next, including:

  • Establishing minimum height and density requirements, as well as eliminating parking requirements in the downtown area (to be initiated fall 2019).
  • Expanding the downtown boundary (to be initiated spring 2020).

Behind on housing goals

In a meeting packed with housing updates, councilors will also review San Jose’s progress toward building housing for all income levels.

A report under review Tuesday sets out guidelines for San Jose to meet its state-mandated housing production goals. Between Jan. 2014 and Oct. 2022, San Jose must produce 35,080 housing units – that breaks down to production of 3,986 units a year.

But data released in the annual housing production report shows that San Jose is behind its goals. Last year, the city issued 2,973 – over 1,000 shy of the city’s annual goal and a four percent drop from the previous year.

Affordable housing permits in particular were well-below the goal. The city last year issued 1,446 affordable housing permits, which was only 61 percent of the way to its goal of 2,370 permits. For market rate housing permits, however, the city issued 1,527 – 94 percent of its goal of 1,617.

Mayor’s budget plan

In preparation for the City Manager’s Office creating next year’s budget, the council is poised to approve a budget plan issued by Liccardo earlier this month. Liccardo’s proposal calls for tightening the city’s purse strings as City Hall braces for an economic downturn.

“The recent release of the City’s five-year general fund forecast shows sources of strain, with combined deficits of approximately $16 million in the half-decade ahead,” he wrote in his message.

Liccardo also put a lens on funding for public safety, housing, homelessness, combating blight and environmental concerns.

Resolution denouncing Trump’s plan to deport Vietnamese immigrants

In an initiative led by Councilmember Lan Diep, the council will adopt a resolution denouncing President Donald Trump’s attempt to deport Vietnamese immigrants who entered the country before 1995, when the U.S. and Vietnam normalized relations.

Last November, Trump tried to deport thousands of Vietnamese refugees who had fled from the fallout of the Vietnam War.

“As San Jose prides ourselves in being the city with the largest population of Vietnamese people outside Vietnam, this council has an obligation to speak out against the Trump Administration’s targeting of the Vietnamese community, just as we have when he targeted Dreamers or members of the transgender community,” Diep wrote in a memo.

Big payout to man brandishing knife

Lawmakers also will consider approving a six-figure settlement to a man who was allegedly injured by San Jose police while he held a knife to his own throat.

City Attorney Rick Doyle suggests paying $215,000 to Benjamin Cooper, who in 2015 was pacing outside a convenience store, holding a knife to his throat.

“A crisis-intervention team officer spoke with him for several minutes, but when plaintiff appeared to be trying to leave the scene, still holding the knife, SJPD fired less than lethal projectiles at him and got him into custody,” read the memo.

The plaintiff lost vision in his right eye as a result. In 2016, he filed suit against the city alleging excessive force, battery, assault and violations of the Bane Act.

The San Jose City Council meets 1:30 p.m. inside the council chamber at City Hall, 200 East Santa Clara Street in San Jose.

Contact Grace Hase at [email protected] or follow @grace_hase on Twitter.

Comment Policy (updated 5/10/2023): Readers are required to log in through a social media or email platform to confirm authenticity. We reserve the right to delete comments or ban users who engage in personal attacks, hate speech, excess profanity or make verifiably false statements. Comments are moderated and approved by admin.

Leave a Reply