Touchdown: Santa Clara settles lawsuit with 49ers
Levi's Stadium in Santa Clara has hosted a stream of headliners. The city just raise its transient occupancy tax in an effort to capture more visitor revenue. File photo.

Three years and millions of dollars later, the San Francisco 49ers and Santa Clara have settled a high-stakes lawsuit over management of Levi’s Stadium.

Three weeks after San José Spotlight first reported the NFL team’s settlement offer, Santa Clara administrators on Wednesday accepted a deal to end the litigation, according to team officials. Before signing the settlement agreement, the city asked team executives to cough up an additional $325,000 to boost the city’s general fund—on top of the $1.3 million it offered to pay into the general fund a week ago. Team leaders said their offer is worth $13 million, including money saved on continued litigation.

The settlement’s value, according to documents obtained by San José Spotlight, includes $2 million from the team for disputed public safety costs and $8 million savings in “future litigation costs” over the next four years.

“Today’s agreement represents the beginning of a renewed partnership between the 49ers and the city of Santa Clara,” Rahul Chandhok, a team spokesman and legal negotiator, told San José Spotlight. “We’re pleased to put this fight behind us for the benefit of Santa Clara’s residents and the stakeholders who rely on Levi’s Stadium for jobs, revenue and entertainment.”

Santa Clara Mayor Lisa Gillmor and interim city attorney Jim Sanchez could not immediately be reached for comment.

The fight began in 2019 after Santa Clara lawmakers—a majority of whom sided with Gillmor—voted to remove the team as manager of the $1.3 billion stadium during non-NFL events. The controversial decision came after councilmembers questioned declining revenue from events at Levi’s Stadium and transparency in the team’s accounting and procurement procedures. The team blamed the drop in revenue on the city’s live events curfew which chased away major concerts and performers—what they dubbed a “music ban.”

The city’s general fund, which pays for things like police, libraries and parks, is supposed to earn 50% of profits from non-NFL events.

The now-settled lawsuit filed in 2019 claimed the city violated a longstanding contract that gave the 49ers the right to manage day-to-day events at the stadium. The dispute was one chapter in a saga of high-profile fights between the football team and the city where it plays—including squabbles over rent, parking at a nearby soccer park and concert curfews.

The team is tied to Santa Clara and the stadium for another 30-plus years, according to its lease. Some city leaders hope Wednesday’s settlement turns a new leaf in the relationship.

Santa Clara Councilmember Karen Hardy fought against Measure J, the 2010 measure that opened the door for Levi’s Stadium to be built. She was worried about mingling public resources with a private entity like the 49ers. But now Hardy said it’s critical for the city to embrace the football team—and repair the rocky relationship.

“I lost that battle but I’m a realistic person and I’m pragmatic,” Hardy told San José Spotlight. “We are in a 30-plus-year marriage without a divorce clause and we need to make it work for everyone involved. What’s the point of fighting when in the end everybody has a black eye?”

Hardy said the team has fixed many of the problems identified a few years ago which led to the decision to terminate the management agreement, including improving accounting procedures and paying prevailing wages to contractors.

“I like the term that Ronald Raegan used when I was in college—you trust but you verify,” she said. “That’s what I intend to do.”

Councilmember Anthony Becker, who said he had a heated closed-door exchange about the settlement with Gillmor and her ally Councilmember Kathy Watanabe on Tuesday, called it a win-win. Becker is running for mayor against Gillmor in November.

“Mayor Gillmor says we are getting peanuts with this deal,” he said, “but under her administration, our community has been getting peanuts.”

Becker believes the settlement now allows officials to invest in the city — instead of litigation.

“This is what progress looks like — it is ending a toxic battle that’s been going on for years and was started by the Gillmor administration,” Becker told San José Spotlight. “In order to move forward, we have to work together and when you act like the current mayor does, it is really hard to get things done. This is money that is going into our general fund and helping us during our rough times.”

Contact Ramona Giwargis at [email protected] or follow @RamonaGiwargis on Twitter.

Comment Policy (updated 5/10/2023): Readers are required to log in through a social media or email platform to confirm authenticity. We reserve the right to delete comments or ban users who engage in personal attacks, hate speech, excess profanity or make verifiably false statements. Comments are moderated and approved by admin.

Leave a Reply